BSH Logo Flag

 

Home

Red Sox

Patriots

Celtics

March Madness
 
  Teams
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
BCEaglesFootball.com
BCHoop.com
 
  More
March Madness
Random Notes
Statistical Analysis
Top Ten Lists
NFL Power Rankings
-Where Are the Bruins?
Email Webmaster
 

Random Notes - November 14, 2002

How ridiculous is the BCS/Bowl system in NCAA football? Boston College may have actually cost itself a bowl slot because they beat Notre Dame. Let me explain. The Big East Champion is guaranteed a BCS slot which would put them in one of the four top bowl games (Orange, Sugar, Fiesta, Rose). The Big East also has contractual obligations with the Gator, Insight, Continental Tire and San Francisco Bowls. Notre Dame is also eligible to take one of the Big East bowl slots as long as they are bowl eligible. The key part here is there are two at-large BCS bids up for grabs (ie. teams that did not win their conference championship). This easiest way to explain this is by using two scenarios. Each scenario assumes that BC finishes 5th in the Big East (and is thus fifth in line among Big East teams for bowl slots behind Miami, Pitt, Virginia Tech and West Virginia).
  • Scenario 1: BC beats Notre Dame and finishes 8-4. Notre Dame loses to BC and USC on Nov 30th and finishes 10-2. The Irish are knocked out of BCS contention. Miami goes to the BCS as Big East Champion, Notre Dame goes to the Gator Bowl, Pittsburgh to the Insight Bowl, Virginia Tech to the Continental Tire Bowl and West Virginia to the San Francisco Bowl. BC is left out in the cold unless another bowl finds itself with an open slot.
  • Scenario 2: BC loses to Notre Dame and finishes 7-5. Notre Dame, whether they lose to USC or not, takes an at-large BCS slot. Miami heads to the BCS as well for winning the Big East. With Notre Dame in the BCS, Pitt can upgrade to the Gator Bowl, Virginia Tech to the Insight Bowl, West Virginia to the Continental Tire and BC grabs the final Big East spot in the San Francisco Bowl.
As you can see, the ludicrous system may punish the Eagles for beating Notre Dame (and winning eight games) instead of losing to Irish (and winning seven games). If this is not an indictment on this terrible system then I don't know what is. Of course, this may all be a moot point if (a) Notre Dame beats USC or (b) BC loses one of its remaining three games.

Speaking of BC, did anyone catch the color commentary of ESPN (and former Notre Dame Coach) Bob Davie during the BC-West Virginia game on Saturday? This may have been the single worst performance by a football announcer ever. Davie repeatedly called BC quarterback Brian St. Pierre "Pierre" (a guy he coached against and recruited) and also mistakenly called West Virginia quarterback Rasheed Marshall "Rasheed Wallace" on more than one occasion. If you can't remember the names of the quarterbacks, you clearly don't belong in the booth. Davie also questioned nearly every single call by the officials that went in favor of Boston College, most of which were good calls. He mispronounced player names all day long, sometimes calling players by their first name. I think all Notre Dame haters are very depressed that this guy is no longer coaching the Irish. The question is: will ESPN extend Davie's contract by five years like Notre Dame did in 2000?

I must admit that I take the greatest of pleasure in seeing the Lakers sitting at 2-6 while playing without Shaquille O'Neal. Brainwashed fans and Los Angeles sports radio personalities have been making foolish claims over the past three years that the Lakers would still be a 45-50 win team without O'Neal for the entire season. I think the early season proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that LA is nothing without Shaq. Beyond Shaq, Kobe and Robert Horry, the Lakers are the biggest collection of stiffs ever assembled. The Lakers are not a great "team" by any definition. They have one of the best duos of all-time and the most dominant player since Wilt Chamberlain, but like the 1990's Bulls, it is a stretch to use the word "team" to describe them. Kobe Bryant is a tremendous player, but he has proven over the first eight games that without Shaq drawing the attention of the defense, he is not much better than Vince Carter.

I also laugh when I hear people talk about the Lakers being "unbeatable" in the Playoffs as long as Shaq is in the lineup. Are these people watching the same games that I am? LA fans will endlessly deny that it was friendly officiating that allowed the Lakers to beat Sacramento in the Western Semis last season (and Portland in Game 7 in 2000 as well), but everyone outside of LA knows the truth. The Lakers have won three titles in a row, but they have only earned one. Even if you discount the officiating, the Lakers needed a buzzer-beater by Robert Horry and several last minute wins to survive in the Western Conference a year ago. It is mind-boggling how people can come up with the word "unbeatable" after witnessing that.

In case you missed it, Miami of Ohio Defensive Coordinator Jon Wauford was arrested and taken off the field in handcuffs after allegedly shoving a fan who had come out onto the field to celebrate Marshall's last second win. The fan hit his head on the artificial turf and was taken to a local hospital with a concussion. When I first heard this news, I was angry that a football coach would lay out an overexuberant college student just for running onto the field after his team won the game. As foolish as it is, it has become tradition for the students to storm the field after any moderately important home victory. The coaches should understand this. Later, however, I learned that the person who was injured was not a college undergrad, but a 36-year-old man. Of course this changed everything in my mind. If anyone deserves to be whacked onto the turf, it is a 36-year-old man running out onto a college field after a win over Miami of Ohio. I sincerely hope that Jon Wauford and Miami of Ohio don't suffer because of the complete idiocy of this 36-year-old teenager.

There was much discussion this week about who should win the American League MVP, Alex Rodriquez or Miguel Tejada. It is clear that A-Rod had the better year than Tejada and in fact, it is arguably the greatest year ever by a shortstop. The other side of the argument is that A-Rod's Rangers finished in last place so how valuable could he have been? The Rangers may have broken the major league for losses in a season without A-Rod, but is that enough to justify giving him the award? Though I agree with the choice of Tejada, I do understand the point of view for those supporting Rodriguez. This argument has come up many times over the years and many times the player on the last place team has won the MVP Award. To me, the solution is simple. Baseball needs a third award called the "Player of the Year." This award would be given each year to the most outstanding position player. This would mean that the Most Valuable Player Award could be reserved for a player that truly made a difference to a winning team, like Tejada, and the Player of the Year Award could be given to the player who had the best overall season - in this case Rodriguez. The added benefit to the extra award is that pitchers would be given more consideration for the MVP. There are some voters who believe that a pitcher should not win the MVP simply because there is already an award for them (the Cy Young). With the Player of the Year Award, voters could no longer make this argument because there would be one award for pitchers, one award for position players and one award open to all players.

While on the subject, Alex Rodriguez was given a $200,000 bonus for finishing second in the MVP race. In case you missed it, A-Rod's contract pays him an average of $25 million per year, but somehow his agent felt that some additional bonuses were necessary. Can you imagine those negotiations?
  • [Enter Slimy Agent's Name Here]: "Well, $25 million per year is nice, but I think we need to add a few bonuses if we are going to sign here."
I would have had a hard time not throwing [Enter Slimy Agent's Name Here] out the window at that point. I'm sure Rangers management agreed to the bonuses just to get the negotiations over with, but I can't even imagine the overwhelming sense of greed that caused someone (be it A-Rod or his agent) to actually ask for it. Sickening.

This year Phil Simms and Boomer Esiason are both on the preliminary list of nominees for the Pro Football Hall of Fame. If Simms and Esiason both make the Hall it will be good news for fans of both the Giants and Bengals. It would also be good news for the guy whose job it is to make the Hall of Fame bronze busts because he could create one head and then just make a copy.

Random Notes - October 30, 2002

For the second year in a row, baseball fans were treated to one of the great World Series' of all-time. Like the Yankees and Diamondbacks a year ago, the Angels and Giants provided dramatic comebacks, late inning heroics and great stories. This year's World Series was particularly special because it matched two organizations that earned their trips to the Series through hard work, solid scouting and intelligent personnel moves, not merely because they had the deepest pockets. With the exception of the egomaniacal Jeff Kent and Barry Bonds, the players on both teams are extremely likeable. Each features a great mix of "out-of-nowhere" rookies, All stars in their primes and experienced veterans looking for a last chance at success. In Barry Bonds, we may have witnessed the most dominant player since Babe Ruth. I am not a Barry Bonds fan, but I can't help but marvel at his outrageous talents.

The only negative part of the Angels victory is that it rewards their enormous contingent of bandwagon fans. Outside of Montreal and the Florida teams, Anaheim probably has the worst fans in the league. I have been to Red Sox-Angels games at Edison Field in each of the past two seasons. Each time there were about 25,000 people in attendance, 20,000 of which are rooting for the Red Sox. Granted, there are some truly diehard Angels fans that were deserving of seeing their hard-luck team finally win the championship, but the vast majority of people in attendance at Edison Field during the playoffs could not have named more than two Angel players four weeks ago. The fact that the crowd was so loud during the Series shows how truly committed Southern Californians are to jumping on the latest trend. It is truly disgusting.

I loved seeing Angel relievers Brendan Donnelley and Ben Weber wearing those goofy specs on the mound. Dodger closer Eric Gagne also sported the glasses on the mound this season. See, I knew that the Kent Tekulve look would make a comeback.

What are the odds that major league baseball would ever have two Benji's/Bengie's in the league, much less on the same team. The World Series featured two Benji's, two Ortiz, two Rodriquez and two Molinas.

Was I the only one expecting a Bad News Bears-like ending to the World Series? I envisioned a scenario with the Angels up by four, bases loaded, two outs, bottom of the ninth inning of Game 7. Barry Bonds strides to the plate. Like Vic Morrow's Roy Turner, Mike Sciosia signals for the intentional walk to Bonds with the bases loaded. Then, in true Kelly Leak fashion, Bonds lunges across the plate and rips the intentional ball into the gap. As the Angels fumble the ball around the outfield, Bonds tries for the inside-the-park homerun and as he reaches the plate ...

At the top of my list of people that deserve to be shot is the guy that created the "Thunderstick" that TV and live audiences were tortured with during the World Series. I think someone needs to find this guy and spend a couple of weeks following him around (to work, to the supermarket, to softball practice) incessantly banging those plastic noisemakers directly into his ear. Only then will he realize the complete and utter evil of his invention.

I think that the major reason why the Angels won the Series is because they were much more focused on the task at hand. The Giants seemed more concerned with whose kid would be the batboy than they were with winning the series. Dusty Baker should be put in jail for allowing his three year old son to run around on a major league baseball diamond. LA Times columnist T.J. Simers came up with a great nickname for Dusty's son Darren - the "Rally Brat."

Hopefully, the success of midmarket teams like Anaheim and San Francisco will continue in the coming years with help from the new revenue sharing agreement that will begin next season. The agreement, though a step in the right direction, does not appear to do enough to spur true competitive balance in major league baseball. Many questions remain: Will the luxury tax coupled with increased revenue sharing put an end to the Yankee Buynasty? Will tightwad owners like the Twins Carl Pohlad actually spend their revenue sharing checks on players or will they simply pocket the profits? Will the owners finally show some fiscal responsibility when it comes to negotiating player contracts? Will Batman escape the Joker's fiendish torture device? (sorry, wrong subject).

The Angels have had the Rally Monkey for two years though no one noticed until this year's playoffs. Given the Angels' success in making late inning comebacks, it seems likely that many of the other clubs will add their own rally creatures. Here are some ideas:
  • Boston - The Rally Lobster
  • New York - The Rally Pimp
  • Baltimore - The Rally Crab
  • Toronto - The Rally Donut
  • Cleveland - Drew Carey
  • Chicago - Da Rally Monkey
  • Detroit - The Rally Carjacker
  • Seattle - The Rally Raincloud
  • Montreal - The Rally Stripper
  • Philadelphia - The Rally Cheesesteak Sandwich
  • Atlanta - The Rally Redneck (post previously held by John Rocker)
  • St. Louis - Archie, the Rally Arch
  • Milwaukee - The Rally Drunk
  • San Francisco - The Rally Interior Decorator
  • Los Angeles - The Rally Washed-up Celebrity
I have harped on this issue many times but it always bears repeating. What an absolute disgrace that once again this year not a single World Series weekend game was televised before 8:00 pm. It is criminal that Major League Baseball and FOX cannot start one or two World Series games at 5:30 pm Eastern Time to accommodate young fans that may not be able to stay up to see the games to their conclusion. Game Six was one of the All-time great baseball games, as was Game Seven a year ago and I'm sure not many kids under the age of 11 were able to see the conclusion of either game. Clearly, additional revenues gained now via the 8:00 pm start time will be more that offset by losses in revenue twenty years from now when no one under the age of 45 will even care about baseball. This is yet another indication that the owners, players and network executives are concerned only with making their money now and care nothing about the future of the sport. Baseball is rapidly losing the interest of its young fan base (and potential fan base) and they don't seem to care one bit.

I love the idea of the Expos playing in Boston next year if for no other reason than it gives the Red Sox a chance to convince Vlad Guerrero how much he loves Boston. I guy can dream can't he?

Random Notes - October 11, 2002

On paper, the 2002 Red Sox look outstanding. Their top two starters will likely end up #1 and #2 in the Cy Young balloting and three of their starters finished among the top four in ERA in the American League. Uggie struggled at times but converted 40 of 46 of his save opportunities. Nomar Garciaparra had an MVP caliber year with a career-best 85 extra base hits, Manny Ramirez hit 33 homers, drove in 107 and won a batting title despite missing 42 games and Johnny Damon gave the Sox their best leadoff hitter since a certain chicken-eating Nebraskan owned the spot a decade ago. Shea Hillenbrand proved to be a solid major league starter and Rey Sanchez filled an enormous void at second base. With all this, the Sox still managed to finish six games out of a playoff spot. I'm not sure any team in history has accomplished less with more than the 2002 Red Sox. The biggest reason for their ultimate failure was their total inability to make clutch pitches and get clutch hits in the 8th and 9th innings. As a result, the Sox were 13-23 in one-run games, including 6-20 in their last 26 one-run games. The Red Sox actually outscored their opponents by a whopping 194 runs in 2002. Here are some numbers to put this in perspective:
  • The Red Sox +194 run differential (Sox Runs minus Opponent Runs) was the fifth best total for any team during the last four years. Two of those teams were this year's Angels (+207) and Yankees (+200). Not surprisingly, the 2001 Mariners (116 wins) have the best run differential during that time (+299). The four teams that had better run differentials than the Red Sox over that time averaged 105 wins.
  • The Sox +194 run differential was 46 better than the 2000 and 2001 Yankees teams combined.
  • The average run differential among playoff teams from 1999-2002 was 141. Those teams won an average of 96 games.
  • The Red Sox and the Mariners became the second and third teams (out of 38) to win 93 or more games and not make the playoffs since the Wild Card was instituted in 1995. The 1999 Reds won 96 games and lost a one-game playoff to the Mets.
Reality shows featuring lunatics like Ozzy Osbourne and Anna Nicole Smith are grabbing huge ratings these days. ESPN, I have four words for you: "The John Rocker Show." Speaking of John Rocker, did you notice that his final 2002 ERA was 6.66? Spooky.

To the people attending home games played by the Angels, A's and Twins. Where the hell were you all season? By the way, the Orange County Transportation Authority will be running extra bandwagons to and from Edison Field during the Playoffs for you convenience.

The Major League Baseball League Championship Series' will feature the Twins, Angels, Giants and Cardinals. The last time I saw these matchups it was 1988 and I was playing R.B.I. Baseball. Nintendo Wally Joyner was THE MAN!

R.B.I. Baseball and Tecmo Bowl will always be the greatest video games of all time. I had to retire from video games when the controller went from three buttons to 38.

I finally caught an episode of CSI: Miami the other night. For some inexplicable reason, the creators decided that David Caruso's character should be named "Horatio." Is there anyone on earth that looks less like a "Horatio" than David Caruso? That makes about as much sense as casting Dennis Franz and calling him "Fabio."

There aren't many better names in sports than that of tennis player Anna Smashnova. Sounds like a cross between Anna Kournikova and Jennifer Capriati. Or would that be Anna Smashednova?

I'm convinced that Saddam Hussein is working as a maintenance man in my office complex. The resemblance is uncanny. Just the other day, I saw him carrying a folder labeled "W.M.D." When I asked him about it, he replied "It stands for, ummm, Waste, ummm, Management Department. Yeah, that's it." Hmmm.

To the Red Sox Public Relations Department, I have two words for you: "Rally Lobster."

Random Notes - September 12, 2002

For what seems like the fifteenth year in a row, Syracuse looks like an intramural flag football team to start the season. Two weeks ago, BYU racked up roughly 12,000 yards of total offense in their drubbing of the Orangemen and last week North Carolina outgained Syracuse by about 200 total yards on their way to a comeback win. Someone at B.C. needs to convince the Syracuse Athletic Department that the two teams can enhance their rivalry by meeting in the season opener each year, rather than waiting until the end of the season.

I watched Black Hawk Down for the first time last week. I'm wondering ... is it now in the Screen Actors Guild bylaws that Tom Sizemore must be in every war movie?

Despite the misery of the Red Sox season, I can't help but feel giddy knowing that Dan Duquette, Carl Everett and Jose Offerman are all long gone.

If the Raiders kick two field goals and lose a game 7-6 this year, will the team and their fans whine about the loss for eight months because NFL rules say that field goals are worth only three points, not four?

I was in shock earlier this week when I learned that the Gilbert Brown-esque Anna Nicole Smith actually has a personal trainer. What is this person being paid to do? I don't think anyone has deserved to be fired this much since Captain Hazelwood took the Exxon Valdez for a drunken joyride.

You know you are spending too much time at work when you are making a call from home and you dial "9" for an outside line.

The Cleveland Browns are now officially the NFL's version of the Boston Red Sox. The Brownies, pre or post expansion, seem to possess the same deadly combination of bufoonery and bad luck that only Boston Red Sox fans can understand. Here is some of the recent history:
  • In 1980, Cleveland was trailing Oakland 14-12 late in the fourth quarter of an AFC Divisional Playoff game. The Browns were well within "chip-shot" range for a likely game-winning field goal when MVP Quarterback Brian Sipe inexplicably threw an interception in the endzone. The play is known as "The Mistake by the Lake" (as is the City of Cleveland, by the way).
  • in 1986, Browns fans witnessed one of the most memorable drives in NFL history when John Elway marched 98 yards in the final five minutes of the AFC Championship Game in Cleveland to tie the score and send the game into overtime. The Broncos won in overtime on a field goal that many argue was wide left.
  • in 1987, Running Back Ernest Byner fumbled at the one yard-line as he was just about to cross the goal line for a possible game-winning score against Denver in yet another AFC Championship game. The Browns surrendered 30 points in the second half that day and lost 38-33.
  • In 1995, Cleveland fans suffered the ultimate indignity as the city lost its franchise - at least temporarily - to Baltimore thanks to the greedy Art Modell.
  • Last season, an improving Browns team lost two heartbreaking games - one in which the Bears completed a Hail Mary touchdown pass to tie the game as time expired then won in overtime on an interception return and another game in which the referees ignored NFL rules by going to an instant replay after the following play had already been executed (the infamous bottle-throwing incident).
  • If all that wasn't enough, the Browns began this season by losing a game only because mental midget Dwayne Rudd took off his helmet before the final play expired, which is a penalty in the NFL. Because a game or half cannot end on a defensive penalty, Kansas City was given one more play, which they used to kick a game-winning field goal for a 40-39 win. Ouch! It's no wonder these people dress up like dogs every week.
What an incredible first week in the NFL, especially when you are a DirecTV/NFL Sunday Ticket subscriber. Of the 16 opening week games, 11 were decided by one score (eight points) or less and most of those were still in doubt with one minute remaining in the game. Three games went to overtime. In fact, three of the five games that were not competitive still gave me great joy - the first, Matt Millen's Lions getting pasted by Miami; the second, the Dallas Felons losing to an expansion team in that franchise's first game ever, and third, the perpetually-disrespected Patriots beating up the Steelers on National TV ... again. Man, it's great to have football back.

Random Notes - September 1, 2002

Three months ago, I believed that the idea of a baseball strike in 2002 was outlandish. Over the past decade, we have grown familiar with the insatiable greed displayed by Major League Baseball players and the unrelenting stupidity that has become commonplace for baseball owners. Still, how could either side be foolish enough to allow a work stoppage that would likely ruin the game forever. The past year has been one of the worst in American history. America has been at war, families are struggling to recover from the events of September 11th and senior citizens have lost their life-savings because of corporate corruption, yet we are forced to listen to the reasons why a collection of 750 arrogant, pampered prima donnas might feel obliged to abandon a game (let me repeat, A GAME) that pays them, on average, $2.5 million per year. That's about $15,000 per day to run around in the sun for two or three hours playing a kid's game. On the other side are a group of 30 billionaire weasels who have backed themselves into a corner with their foolish overspending. Many of these same men promised fans a new era of fiscal responsibility after the 1994 strike, then promptly allowed the average player salary to double in the next seven years. I am certainly not one of those people who will claim that baseball players are paid too much. These men are the best in the world at what they do. If Keanu Reeves can earn $20 million per movie and a CEO can earn a $50 million annual bonus when his company's stock falls 80% in the same year then Alex Rodriquez is probably a bargain at $25 million per year. The problem lies in the fact that the game's health is jeopardized by these salaries. But, I guess all is well that end's well. For the first time, the two sides actually reached an agreement without a work stoppage. That in itself is historic. I have read through the specifics of the new labor agreement. Here is a rundown of what I like and don't like about the new collective bargaining agreement.

What I like
  1. The fact that they reached an agreement -- Eight negotiations, eight work stoppages. You could not find more ominous data than that. The key to this round of negotations was that the players actually made compromises. In the past, the players have agreed to take one step for every 19 steps that the owners take. In this case, both sides gave ground. I think the players realized that the owners were serious this time and would not simply cave in as they have in the past. With the majority of clubs losing money, the status quo favored by the players was simply not an option.
  2. The role of the fans -- The players and owners have shown time and time again that the feelings of the fans mean nothing to them. The expectation in the past has been that fans have short memories and do not hold grudges and would therefore be quick to return to ballparks once the work stoppage ended. Many fans returned after the 1994 strike, but much of that was a result of the heroics of Sammy Sosa, Mark McGwire and Cal Ripken, coupled with a surging economy and the novelty of many new ballparks. In recent weeks the media painted a picture of fans who would clearly hold a grudge if baseball players went on strike in 2002. Baseball is already losing the younger demographic and a strike may have cost them much of the rest of us. I truly believe that the fan uprising had a major impact on each side's willingness to compromise. So to all those people who voiced you opinion, pat yourselves on the back.
  3. Increased Revenue Sharing -- The new deal calls for each club to contribute 34% of its revenue (after ballpark expenses) to a revenue-sharing pool. This is a rather large increase over the 20% that had been in place. Baseball can not survive when half of its teams are hopelessly out of playoff contention by early July. How long do you think people in Kansas City and Pittsburgh will deal with losing before they give up on the sport entirely? The players (and George Steinbrenner) complain about higher revenue-sharing, claiming that it "subsidizes" small market clubs, but to me it makes perfect sense. If the Yankees' cable station pays them $2 million to telecast a game against the Kansas City Royals, why shouldn't the Royals get half of that money? The last time I checked, the Yankees couldn't play a game without an opponent and I don't think they could get a $200 million per year to take on the Yankee farm teams every night. From the player perspective, revenue-sharing should only those on the lower two-thirds of the salary pyrimid because more teams would have money to bid for their services. I would have liked to have seen a revenue-sharing figure closer to 40% but 34% will certainly help to bring a little more competitive balance to the game.
  4. Drug Testing -- At this point we do not know how many of today's players are using steroids. My hope is that the number is not nearly as high as the Ken Caminiti's of the world claim it to be. Drug testing can only be good for the game. Those who are cheating should be exposed. Those who are not cheating, but are suspected of using steroids, deserve a chance to put an end to the suspicion. Those who are already using these substances now have an incentive to clean up their acts.
What I don't like
  1. Luxury Tax Thresholds -- The team payroll levels at which the luxury tax kicks in is way to high. If any sport needs a salary cap, it is major league baseball with its dramatic discrepancies in local revenue. Even with revenue-sharing increases, the Yankees will still have more than twice as much money to spend on players as the Oakland A's. Granted, this is better than the Yankees having four times as much money to spend as the A's, but the opportunity to buy championships will remain.
  2. No Minimum Payoll Requirements -- The problems in baseball stemming from payoll inequity are not all about who has the money, but who is willing to spend the money. The transfer of revenues from big market to small market clubs does no good if the small market owners are not forced to spend that money on players. There is no reason to believe that Twins Owner Carl Pohlad (baseball's version of Jeremy Jacobs) won't put that big revenue-sharing check into a new mansion or some European sports cars. Both sides really dropped the ball on this issue.
  3. The Sox Season Continues -- The Red Sox are now five games behind in the Wild Card race, they are a mind-bending 5-22 in their last 27 one-run or extra inning games and Pedro is having injury problems. I'm not sure if I can take another month of this.


And the Rest of the Notes ...

Believe it or not, I was relieved when William Green decided to leave Boston College early and enter the NFL Draft. Green gave BC fans many thrills during his three years at the Heights, but it became abundantly clear last season that William felt that his own interests came before the team. Green was suspended not once, but twice in the past two years for violating team rules. The second suspension last season almost certainly cost the Eagles a victory over eventual National Champion Miami. Many BC fans made excuses for Green, claiming that he is young and immature and should be given the benefit of the doubt. The last time I checked, the rest of those guys on the team were young as well, but they were able to follow Coach O'Brien's rules. The Eagles will miss Green's talent, but he is clearly not a guy that the 2002 Eagles could have counted on. It is very unfortunate that Green tarnished what was a phenomenal career at BC. However, despite my enormous disappointment, I do wish Green well in his new career with the Cleveland Browns.

I really, really hate the fact that I have to root against Tyrone Willingham now that he coaches Notre Dame. Willingham is likeable and has all the makings of a great coach. If he succeeds at Notre Dame, it will be that much tougher to stomach knowing that Notre Dame ended up with Willingham only because of their own ineptitude while searching for a replacement for Bob Davie. If Willingham had refused Notre Dame's offer, the only coach left would have been Craig T. Nelson.

If there is a sequel to Vin Diesel's new action movie XXX (and we know that there will be), will it be called XXXXXX or YYY?

I caught a glimpse of the WBNA's Seattle Storm Coach Lin Dunn the other day. Are we 100% certain that this isn't Dick Versace in drag?

Is there anyone that looks more uncomfortable in an interview than Mel Gibson?

One of the funniest television moments of the past month was when Bill Parcells said that he "always had a thing for Kathleen Turner" on the YES Network's interview show Center Stage. I guess the Tuna is human after all.

NOTES ARCHIVE

Sox Notes - 2007

NCAA Tournament - 2007

AFC Championship (Jan 2007)

Sox Notes - 2006

NCAA Tournament - 2006

Feb-Mar 2006

Sox Notes - 2005

Pats Notes - 2005

NCAA Tournament - 2005

Superbowl XXXIX

Jan-Dec 2005

Sox Notes - 2004

Superbowl XXXVIII

Celtics Notes (Feb 2004)

Sep-Dec 2004

Jun-Aug 2004

Jan-May 2004

Sox Notes - 2003

Fake News from Notre Dame

Celtics Notes (May 2003)

Jul-Sep 2003

Feb-May 2003

January 2003

My NFL Sunday Ticket Diary

Sep-Nov 2002

June 2002

May 2002

April 2002

March 2002

February 2002

January 2002

December 2001

November 2001

October 2001

September 2001

October 2000